Don’t let the legislature erode trust in our locally elected school board members!
Two bills currently in the Utah State House (HB 161 and HB 173) outline how a local school board decision could be challenged by referendum, posing potential threats to the crucial role of our elected school boards.
The Value of Locally Elected School Boards
Locally elected school boards are the backbone of our thriving public education system. School board members intimately understand the needs of their district’s students because they are our neighbors, our friends, and our families: they live and work in the areas they represent, giving them an unparalleled ability to make informed decisions that affect their own communities.
As a result, school board members’ roles are not merely administrative: rather, they are part of the very fabric of the community they represent.
The Potential Effects of HB 161 and HB 173
Thanks to the election process, school board members are already accountable to voters. Duly elected school board members derive their authority from the communities they serve and who have voted them into office. They have been entrusted with the profound responsibility of making decisions for our children and must be empowered to do so. Additionally, all school boards operate in open, public meetings where stakeholders can voice their concerns, provide feedback and contribute to the decision-making process.
However, by enabling public referendums on decisions made by elected school board members, HB 161 and 173 will erode public trust of our elected school boards and undermine the vital relationship between local communities and their schools.
These two bills will threaten school boards’ authority by potentially adding unnecessary bureaucracy, delaying swift, responsive decision making, and contributing to the politicization of school boards by extreme ideologies or special interest groups.